Forfeiture in residential tenancies
Sharfaa Kerkache • May 11, 2023
Certain types of tenancies fall outside of the usual Section 8 and Section 21 procedure, what can we use to evict a tenant
Certain types of tenancies, such as common law tenancies where the annual rent is over £100k or tenancies let to a company tenant, fall outside of the usual s8 and s21 procedure.
Forfeiture is a procedure that allows a landlord to evict a tenant if there has been a breach of a term of the tenancy, most commonly rent arrears. If the tenant falls into rent arrears a landlord is entitled to forfeit the tenancy for non-payment of rent.
The tenancy agreement usually has a forfeiture clause which states that, if at any time rent is unpaid a landlord can re-enter and take possession of the property. Although the clause states that you may re-enter the property and take possession, you must obtain a court order for possession because the property is being used for residential purposes. By re-entry, the landlord forfeits the tenancy.
However, you have the right to treat the tenancy at an end and seek possession based on forfeiture. You should, however, be aware that it does mean that the tenancy is at an end, i.e. the tenant is no longer liable for future rent until the end of the tenancy agreement, nor are they bound by any of the other terms of the agreement.
This does not mean that the tenant is entitled to occupy the property for free. You are entitled to claim "damages for use and occupation of the property” which, in practice, means payment of an amount equivalent to the rent on the basis that the tenant is depriving you of the use of the property and your ability to re-let it to someone else.
Waiver
It is important not to do anything which would be interpreted as waving your right to forfeiture, for example doing anything inconsistent with the tenancy having come to an end. Demanding the rent is inconsistent with the tenancy having ended and therefore the demand is treated in law as the landlord accepting the continuation of the tenancy and so the right to forfeiture is lost. This is an important point as landlords and agents can often get into difficulties on the issue of waiver. The easiest way of avoiding the problem is to imagine your tenants now occupying the property as trespassers. They have no legal right to be there (albeit that you need a court order to remove them) and you have no agreement with them. The only thing you can now demand from them is an amount equivalent to the rent for their continued occupation of the property.
Relief from forfeiture
Although you are entitled to treat the tenancy at an end and bring a claim for forfeiture, tenants can apply for relief from forfeiture. Relief from forfeiture means that the tenancy is treated as having continued its original terms. Specifically, if the tenant pays all the arrears and costs not less than 5 days before the court hearing they are automatically entitled to relief from forfeiture and the claim ceases.
Similarly, a court must give a minimum of 4 weeks for the tenant to pay the arrears and costs after the court hearing and, if they do, they are entitled to relief from forfeiture. The court has the power to extend that period on the application of the tenant and there is a long-stop provision allowing tenants to apply for relief from forfeiture for six months after the landlord recovers possession. This does not mean that you cannot re-let the property for six months as the courts do not expect landlords to leave properties empty for that period on the off chance that the tenant may apply for relief.
You are entitled to act reasonably in re-letting the property and when considering whether it is reasonable to grant relief from forfeiture the court would take into account whether there are new tenants in the property. I would also point out that relief from forfeiture will always be on the basis that any arrears and costs are paid so you would not be out of pocket.
Action steps
Forfeiture is a very complicated and outdated area of law. It is important to understand the effect of forfeiture as it has a significant impact on both the landlord and the tenant.
If any applicable tenancies do fall into rent arrears, then take immediate action:
Consult a solicitor if a tenant falls into rent arrears as you do not need to wait until there are 2 months’ rent outstanding like with usual AST tenancies.
Once a solicitor has been instructed then the safest thing to do is do nothing! Forfeiture is possibly the only procedure where the advice is for landlords/agents to do nothing. With forfeiture, there is a very fine line that can be crossed which could jeopardise court proceedings. Therefore agents/landlords should immediately cease any action that recognises the existence of the tenancy to prevent any issues with waiver and so any court proceedings are not affected.
It is recommended to cease communications with the tenant and leave this with the solicitor to communicate with the tenant on your behalf. The Solicitor will review the tenancy including the forfeiture clause and assess whether the tenancy can be terminated at that point.
Woodstock’s specialist lawyers can assist with terminating all types of tenancies. If you are unsure what is the correct procedure for a type of tenancy, then please do not hesitate to get in touch and we can help. Woodstock Legal Services are on hand to guide you through the process and also communicate with the tenant on your behalf if required to help recover possession of the property as quickly as possible.
Contact Us
News & Insights
Having a clear plan to protect your intellectual property (I.P.) is one of the most important steps a new business can take. From your brand name to your website and logo, these assets define your identity and give you a competitive edge. In his latest insight, Media and Technology Law Consultant Solicitor Luke English shares the five most common intellectual property mistakes that start-ups make, and how to avoid them to secure your business’s future. 1. Failing to Think About Intellectual Property from the Start Your intellectual property is at the heart of your business. It’s everything you create that’s unique to you, your company name, logo, website, content, or trademark. Yet many start-ups fail to think about I.P. protection early enough. When you're launching a business, it is easy to focus on short-term goals like getting products to market or building your client base. However, failing to plan your I.P. strategy early on can have serious consequences. Competitors could register similar trademarks, copy your ideas, or even prevent you from using your own brand if they secure protection first. Early registration of trademarks, copyrights, and patents helps safeguard your innovation and ensures that what you’ve built remains yours. It is not just about protection; it’s about adding value to your business and strengthening your brand identity in the long term. 2. Failing to Carry Out Proper I.P. Searches Start-ups often come up with creative, memorable names and logos, but before you invest in design, marketing, and branding, it’s essential to check that your chosen name or concept isn’t already being used. A simple intellectual property clearance search can save you from major legal and financial issues later. Ensure that your company name, website domain, and social media handles are all available and consistent across platforms. This not only prevents disputes but also makes it easier for your customers to find and recognise you online. Failing to carry out these searches could result in a cease and desist letter arriving just as your brand begins to grow. Rebranding can be costly and disruptive, especially in the early stages of your start-up. Investing a little time and legal advice upfront ensures that your name and brand are genuinely yours to use. 3. Inadequate Documentation of I.P. Ownership In the excitement of building a new business, it’s easy to overlook paperwork, but documentation is vital when it comes to proving ownership of your intellectual property. Every idea, design, and creative output your business produces should be documented, dated, and clearly attributed to your company. Always use the copyright symbol (©) where appropriate and make sure that your trademarks are formally registered. This becomes particularly important when you begin licensing or assigning your intellectual property to others. Without proper documentation, it can be difficult to prove ownership or defend your rights if they’re challenged. Clear records also make your business more attractive to investors, who will want reassurance that the I.P. is securely owned and protected. 4. Failing to Secure Ownership of I.P. Created by Others Many start-ups rely on contractors, freelancers, or third-party developers to create important assets such as websites, apps, logos, or content. However, if the ownership of that work isn’t formally transferred to your business, you may not actually own it. Always ensure that your contracts with external providers include clear clauses assigning all I.P. rights to your company. This includes web designers, marketing agencies, and software developers. Without this, you could face licensing fees or even legal disputes later if you try to use, modify, or sell those assets. The same principle applies to employees. Your employment contracts should clearly state that any intellectual property created in the course of their work belongs to the employer. This helps to prevent ownership issues in the future and protects your right to use and develop your own creations. For example, imagine selling your company only to discover you don’t own the rights to your website or domain name, an all-too-common mistake that can seriously affect a business’s valuation. Proper legal contracts prevent this from happening. 5. Failing to Protect What’s Yours Even with ownership secured, your I.P. is vulnerable if it’s not properly protected in practice. Many start-ups make the mistake of discussing inventions, ideas, or branding publicly before securing legal protection. If you pitch your product or discuss your designs without a confidentiality or non-disclosure agreement (NDA) in place, you risk losing the ability to patent or register them later. Patent law requires novelty at the time of filing, meaning that public disclosure could make your invention ineligible for protection. Always document who you meet with, when and where meetings take place, and what information is shared. Having these records, alongside properly drafted NDAs, reduces the risk of leaks, plagiarism, or competitors “copying and pasting” your ideas. Protecting your I.P. isn’t just a legal formality; it’s an important part of safeguarding your innovation and ensuring that your hard work remains your own. How Woodstock Legal Services Can Help Your Start-Up At Woodstock Legal Services, we understand that launching a start-up can be overwhelming, especially when it comes to the legal side of protecting your intellectual property. Our team offers comprehensive, practical support to help you understand these challenges. Luke English , our Media and Technology Law Consultant Solicitor, can advise on contracts with website developers, trademark applications, terms and conditions, and confidentiality agreements: l.english@woodstocklegalservices.co.uk Richard Hiron , our Employment Law Solicitor, can assist with employment and consultant contracts to ensure I.P. created by your team is properly assigned to your company: r.hiron@woodstocklegalservices.co.uk By taking proactive steps now, you can avoid costly disputes later and build a business that’s both legally sound and ready to grow.
Buying or selling a home is one of the biggest financial commitments you’ll ever make, and knowing exactly what costs to expect can make the process far less stressful. In her latest insight, Kerry Parsons , Residential Property Conveyancing Team Lead & Consultant Chartered Legal Executive at Woodstock Legal Services, explains the essentials of Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) in 2025, and what every homeowner, first-time buyer, or investor needs to plan for. What Is Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT)? Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) is essentially a property tax applied when you purchase a home in England or Northern Ireland. It’s based on the purchase price of the property, with higher rates applying to more expensive homes. For most buyers in 2025, SDLT starts on properties worth over £125,000. That means if your new home costs more than this threshold, you’ll need to budget for SDLT in addition to your deposit, legal fees, and other moving expenses. If you’re a first-time buyer, the rules are more generous. You currently pay no SDLT up to £300,000 and then pay 5% on anything up to £500,000. It’s worth noting that SDLT doesn’t apply in Scotland or Wales, where separate systems, Land and Buildings Transaction Tax (LBTT) in Scotland and Land Transaction Tax (LTT) in Wales, operate. For buyers in England and Northern Ireland, however, SDLT is unavoidable in most transactions and can have a significant impact on your overall budget. Why SDLT Catches Buyers Out The importance of planning ahead One of the most common mistakes buyers make is treating SDLT as an afterthought. While it might not be the most exciting part of moving house, it can cause real financial headaches if you haven’t factored it into your budget early on. For example: Bu ying a freehold home for £300,000 as a first-time buyer = no SDLT. Buying a £300,000 home, having owned a property before = £5,000 in SDLT. That’s a significant extra cost, and one that can derail your finances if it isn’t planned for. Many buyers budget carefully for deposits and mortgage repayments, but overlook SDLT until late in the process. By then, it can feel like an unexpected bill rather than a cost you’ve prepared for. If you’re unsure, you can use the government’s free SDLT calculator to estimate your liability before making an offer Calculate Stamp Duty Land Tax SDLT and moving chains Another reason SDLT often catches people out is that many moves involve chains. This is selling one property while buying another. If your transaction is dependent on timing, or you’re buying before your sale completes, your SDLT liability could change, especially if you temporarily own two homes. Factoring in this possibility early is key to avoiding unnecessary stress later. Higher Rates for Additional Properties If you’re buying an additional property, such as a buy-to-let, a second home, or if you’re keeping your old property while purchasing a new one, you’ll usually have to pay 5% on top of SDLT rates if buying a new residential property means you’ll own more than one. This catches many people out. Even if you’re only keeping your old home for a short time, you’ll typically need to pay the surcharge upfront and then apply for a refund later, provided you sell within the current three-year window. For example, a property worth £350,000 would typically attract SDLT of about £7,500. But if it’s an additional residential property, the higher‐rate surcharge raises that to around £25,000, which is a major increase. T hat’s why getting professional advice early in the process is so valuable. Can You Claim SDLT Relief or Exemptions? There are limited situations where SDLT reliefs or exemptions may apply. For example: Transfers between spouses or civil partners Purchases involving multiple dwellings Certain mixed-use properties or shared ownership arrangements For most straightforward home purchases, however, SDLT will apply in some form. If you think your circumstances may qualify for relief, it’s always best to seek advice from a specialist tax adviser alongside your conveyancer. It’s also worth noting that SDLT rules can become complex in cases involving trusts, company purchases, or inheritance. In these situations, specialist legal and tax advice is essential to avoid mistakes or unexpected liabilities. SDLT Changes in the UK – Why You Shouldn’t Assume If it feels like Stamp Duty Land Tax is always in the headlines, that’s because it is. Successive governments frequently tweak SDLT rules and thresholds, sometimes permanently and sometimes temporarily. For example, during the pandemic, a stamp duty holiday provided buyers with short-term relief, only for thresholds to revert afterwards. More recently, SDLT has been a topic of political debate, with calls for reform from different parties. This is why it’s essential not to rely on what a friend or colleague paid in the past. The SDLT rules in 2025 may look very different to those in 2020 or even 2023. Always check the current SDLT rules with your conveyancer or a trusted tax adviser before making any financial commitments. My Conveyancing Advice – Plan Ahead and Budget Early From my experience as a conveyancer, the best advice I can give is to treat Stamp Duty Land Tax as a central part of your property budget from the very beginning. Knowing what you’ll owe early gives you room to plan your mortgage realistically and helps you avoid any last-minute surprises. It also ensures you don’t overstretch your finances when you should be enjoying the excitement of your move. It’s also important to remember that your conveyancer submits the SDLT return on your behalf, but it remains your personal tax return. The calculation could be incorrect if you don’t provide full and accurate information about your circumstances. Always be upfront with your conveyancer or tax adviser to ensure everything is properly declared. Another tip is to keep an eye on government announcements. Even small changes in thresholds or exemptions can make a significant difference to your liability. By staying informed and speaking with your conveyancer early, you’ll have a clear picture of what to expect. Final Thoughts on Stamp Duty Land Tax in 2025 Angela Rayner’s recent comments may have reignited the debate on SDLT, but the basics remain unchanged: SDLT applies to most property purchases in England and Northern Ireland Rules vary for first-time buyers, movers, and second-home purchases Planning ahead is critical to a smooth and stress-free move At Woodstock Legal Services, we don’t provide tax advice, but we do ensure our clients are fully informed throughout the conveyancing process, including SDLT obligations, and can signpost you to a tax specialist if you need additional guidance.
The Woodstock vision was to create a law firm that felt different, one where lawyers had true freedom and flexibility within a community of grade A lawyers and the best operational and regulatory support on offer - all while ensuring our clients remain our constant focus. Since 2014, Woodstock has grown into a community of more than 60 lawyers, built on the principle that legal practice can be both professional and personal. We set out to create a place where lawyers have the freedom to shape fulfilling careers, and where clients benefit from clear, expert advice delivered with genuine care. That vision remains at the heart of everything we do. By joining the Lawhive Group, we are strengthening this vision - combining the trusted relationships and values that define Woodstock, with innovative tools that ease the pressures of legal work. This means our lawyers can dedicate more time to what matters most: guiding and supporting our clients. As our founder, Carly Jermyn , explains: “I’ve always believed a different kind of legal culture was possible, and with Woodstock, we’ve proven it. We’ve created a place where lawyers are supported to grow their careers in a way that fits their lives and works for their clients. This partnership is about scaling that vision with the right kind of technology - AI that enhances our skills and values. What makes it unique is that our lawyers will have the opportunity to shape the tools they use every day.” We recognise that the use of AI in legal practice raises important questions, and that’s why this step is being taken in a carefully controlled and fully compliant way - with SRA approval, and while ensuring confidentiality and compliance remain at the centre of our work at all times. At the heart of Lawhive’s technology are AI colleagues capable of working alongside and supporting human lawyers. Lawrence, Lawhive's first AI colleague is a proprietary AI legal assistant. Lawrence drafts documents, completes case research, and handles routine case management with minimal input - scoring 81% on the rigorous Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE), far above the 55% pass threshold. The goal is not to replace lawyers, but to augment their work, reducing repetitive tasks and legal admin. "We're demonstrating that technology can support and enhance the best aspects of legal practice while creating communities where lawyers shape how that technology evolves," said Pierre Proner, CEO and co-founder of Lawhive. "We believe that Lawhive’s vertically integrated model of a regulated law firm and tech platform for lawyers to work alongside AI colleagues, creates better outcomes for everyone." For our clients, your experience with Woodstock does not change. You will continue to work with the same lawyers you know and trust, supported by the same ethos that has shaped our firm from the beginning. What evolves is the scope of what we can achieve, as we combine human expertise with pioneering technology to deliver legal services fit for the future. We are proud of what we have built, and confident in the path ahead. Read the full announcement on Sky News here.
Discover 7 common mistakes in UK employment contracts and how to avoid them. Expert advice from Woodstock Legal Services to protect your business
Fraudulent tenants can cause serious financial and legal problems. Landlord and Tenant Consultant Solicitor Zoe Turner of Woodstock Legal Services explains how rental scams work, warning signs to watch for, and how thorough tenant referencing can protect your property.
With the Renters’ Rights Bill (RRB) having entered its report stage in the House of Lords on Thursday, 4 July 2025, landlords across England are watching closely to see what shape the final legislation might take. In this insight, experienced landlord and tenant solicitor Ryan Heaven addresses a growing concern in the sector: will the same restrictions that currently apply to Section 21 notices also apply to Section 8 ? This article separates fact from fiction and offers landlords across the UK clear, practical guidance on what’s actually in the pipeline for Section 8 notices , and how to stay compliant. What’s Happening with the Renters’ Rights Bill? The Renters’ Rights Bill 2025 has remained a central focus for private landlords and letting professionals across the country. With the government proposing a wide-ranging reform of the private rental sector, one of the headline changes is the long-anticipated abolition of Section 21 notices , commonly referred to as “no-fault evictions.” Royal Assent for RRB is expected in September; therefore, we will know the final version of the law at this stage. But as with any major legislative reform, uncertainty can breed misinformation, and the slower the progress, the louder the rumours become. Section 8 Restrictions: What Are Landlords Hearing? One persistent rumour has been making the rounds among landlords and letting agents: The same restrictions currently applied to Section 21 notices , such as requirements for valid Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) , Gas Safety Certificates , and the How to Rent guide , will also be applied to Section 8 notices as part of the Renters’ Rights Bill. Let’s be clear: this rumour is false. What’s the Legal Difference Between Section 21 and Section 8 Notices? For those new to the distinction between the two possession routes: Section 21 notices allow landlords to regain possession of a property without giving a reason, which is why they’re referred to as “no-fault” evictions. Section 8 notices require the landlord to rely on one of the grounds for possession listed in the Housing Act 1988 . These include reasons such as rent arrears , anti-social behaviour , or other breaches of tenancy. At present, Section 21 notices are highly regulated. If landlords do not provide required documents, such as a valid EPC, Gas Safety Certificate, or How to Rent guide, the notice becomes invalid. Section 8 notices, on the other hand, are not currently bound by these documentation requirements. And according to government updates, that is not about to change. What’s the Official Government Position on Section 8 Notices? While the Bill continues to evolve, there are some concrete steps landlords can take today to stay ahead of the curve: Review your deposit processes to ensure you’re fully compliant with protection schemes and prescribed information delivery Understand the grounds for possession under Section 8 ; these will soon be your primary tool Monitor updates around the expected standardised notice form due later this year Seek early legal advice when considering eviction, especially where compliance issues may arise Being proactive now will save time, money and stress later. The earlier you resolve any grey areas, the stronger your legal position will be when the RRB becomes law. Specialist Advice from Woodstock Legal Services Whether you’re getting to grips with the Renters’ Rights Bill, managing a complex tenancy, or ensuring your notices are fully compliant, our award-winning Landlord & Tenant Team is here to help.
In his latest insight, Employment Law Consultant Richard Hiron explores how UK employers and HR professionals can handle personal relationships between staff in the workplace sensitively and lawfully. While there’s no specific legislation banning such relationships, failing to manage them appropriately could expose you
Following Ozzy Osbourne’s passing, Woodstock Legal Services explores the legal steps behind the scenes—royalties, estates, and what this means for others.
Having a working relationship with an outsourced HR provider can make day-to-day people management easier for many businesses. But what happens when that relationship goes a step too far? In his latest insight, Employment Law Consultant Richard Hiron explores when outsourced HR professionals may legally become agents of their clients, and why this matters. Why Outsourced HR Services Appeal to UK Businesses Outsourced HR services offer a range of benefits that have made them increasingly attractive to UK employers. These include: Cost-effectiveness compared to employing a full-time HR team Greater freedom in advising clients than being an in-house HR adviser A sense of legal separation, making HR advisers appear at arm’s length from internal decisions However, recent case law from the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) suggests that outsourced HR professionals may not always be as independent as they assume, and that they need to be very careful not just about the contractual terms of their arrangements with their clients, but also the practical application of the relationship. Handa v The Station Hotel: What Happened? The case of Handa v The Station Hotel (Newcastle) Limited and others [2025] EAT 62 raised important questions about the legal standing of outsourced HR professionals. We won’t linger on the details, because you didn’t come here for a lecture in employment law, but in essence: An employed director reported potential financial misconduct, which could have been classified as whistleblowing (also known as “protected disclosures”). Complaints from other staff members about bullying and harassment were then made against that director. One outsourced HR consultant was instructed to investigate those complaints and recommended that disciplinary action against the director be considered. A second outsourced HR professional conducted the disciplinary hearing and advised that the employer would be “justified” in dismissing the director for gross misconduct - advice issued in collaboration with the employer’s solicitors. Ultimately, the employer dismissed the director, based on the outsourced HR professional’s recommendation. What Is an Agency Relationship in Employment Law? It is not enough to simply provide a service or act helpfully to become someone’s agent in the eyes of the law. Legally, an agent is someone who has been authorised to act on behalf of another person or organisation, often with the ability to make decisions that directly affect that person’s legal or financial position. Typically, an agent is someone trusted to act in another’s best interests, which is why many agents are also fiduciaries. Trustees, company directors, financial advisers, business partners, and solicitors are common examples of these. What they have in common is the authority to affect relationships between the person or organisation they represent and third parties. Crucially, there must usually be more than just a contract for services for a person to be considered an agent. An agency relationship arises when a person has decision-making authority and is actively representing the interests of someone else with their approval. Without that, no matter how beneficial or reliable the service provided, an agency relationship is unlikely to be found. What Would Make an Outsourced HR Professional an Agent? In the Handa case, neither of the two outsourced HR professionals was found to be an agent in the decision to dismiss the employed director. But that doesn't mean an agency relationship couldn’t have existed elsewhere. Here’s where the legal line gets blurry: 1. Performing Core Employer Functions If an outsourced HR consultant performs functions that are typically reserved for the employer, such as conducting grievance processes or disciplinary hearings, they may be considered the employer’s agent. This is especially the case where employees or third parties deal directly with the HR provider, and the employer has little or no involvement. 2. Going Beyond Contractual Services Even where a written contract exists, carrying out roles that go beyond pure service delivery can give rise to an agency relationship. Whilst a fiduciary relationship is a key hallmark of agency, it is not the only factor in determining whether an outsourced HR professional will be considered an agent. This may include making final decisions on matters such as pay, dismissal, or internal procedures. 3. Exercising Authority Without Oversight Where the HR provider is granted authority to act independently, for example, to run a disciplinary process from start to finish without significant input from the employer, they may be legally classified as an agent. 4. Evidence of Collusion or Shared Control The closer the working relationship between the employer and the HR consultant, the more likely it is that the agency will be inferred. In the Handa case: The first HR professional merely recommended a disciplinary process. The second HR professional reviewed the evidence and concluded dismissal was justified, but did not carry it out herself. If either had gone a step further and directly made the dismissal or made other decisions on behalf of the employer, they would likely have crossed the line into agency. 5. Perception Alone Is Not Enough An employee’s perception that an HR professional is acting on behalf of the employer is not enough by itself to create a legal agency, but might be important if combined with other factors. However, in Handa, the director’s claims of being victimised after whistleblowing did not automatically make the HR professionals agents of the employer. How Outsourced HR Professionals Can Avoid Legal Risk So, what can HR consultants do to protect themselves? Be Clear in Your Contracts The contract with your client should clearly state the limits of your role. Avoid any language that implies you can make final decisions on behalf of the employer, especially regarding disciplinary action, grievance outcomes, or dismissals. Simply saying that you are not your client’s agent is unlikely to be enough, especially if your actions do not match what your contract with your client says. Stay Within Advisory Boundaries Advise, recommend, support, but don’t decide. Let your clients make the final call, even if you believe a certain outcome is justified. This is where the line between adviser and agent is often drawn. Avoid Acting Like an Employee Don’t allow staff to contact you directly for day-to-day HR matters unless this is carefully managed through a defined service agreement. Even then, remember that providing services like payroll, internal HR policies, grievances, or disciplinaries puts you in sensitive territory. Seek Legal Advice When in Doubt If you find yourself being asked to take actions that go beyond your usual service scope, pause and take legal advice. It may save you significant time, stress and potential liability later. Why This Case Matters for Employment Law Professionals The Handa decision serves as an important reminder that legal responsibility doesn't always rest neatly with the employer. If you’re working with HR consultants or are one yourself, understanding where legal boundaries lie is critical. This is especially important for: Solicitors working with SMEs who rely on outsourced HR providers HR professionals offering freelance or agency services Employers who want to reduce legal risk when outsourcing HR functions Specialist Advice from Woodstock Legal Services Worried about becoming responsible for your client’s employment decisions? At Woodstock Legal Services, we specialise in employment law advice tailored to HR professionals and consultants. Richard Hiron, our experienced Employment Law Consultant, has worked directly in the HR sector and regularly advises outsourced HR professionals across the UK. Whether you need advice on contracts, investigations, disciplinaries or complex whistleblowing concerns, Richard is here to support you.