Understanding Anti-Social Behaviour Evictions
Anna Hughes • July 22, 2024
Anti-social behaviour is a huge issue in communities and neighbourhoods, often affecting the quality of life for many residents in the area.
What Constitutes Anti-Social Behaviour?
On 27 March 2023, the former Conservative Government released a policy paper on their Anti-Social Behaviour Action Plan. The policy stated:
Everyone has the right to live without the fear of facing anti-social behaviour. To leave their home without dreading intimidation from neighbours, visit their local high street free of disorder and drug taking, take the train or bus to work without fear of abuse, and walk down a pavement clear of dog mess and litter. Women and girls should not feel unsafe walking alone at night and families should not be intimidated away from parks by drug paraphernalia and groups of youths engaging in threatening behaviour. Businesses should not suffer and shops shutter because town centres are no longer places people want to be.
Anti-social behaviour covers criminal and non-criminal behaviour including:
a) intimidatory behaviour, such as threatening or unruly behaviour, drunkenness, harassment and loitering in public spaces;
b) drug use, and the paraphernalia, mess and disruption that can go with it;
c) vandalism, graffiti, and the plague of fly-tipping and littering; and
d) disruptive neighbours consistently playing loud music or letting their dog bark all night.
The Conservative Government reported that in the private rented sector, one in three landlords who have ended a tenancy reported that they did so because their tenant demonstrated antisocial behaviour.
How do landlords currently obtain possession from anti-social behaviour tenants?
The tools currently available for landlords to recover possession from anti-social behaviour tenants are:
Ground 7a Section 8 Notice - to establish mandatory ground 7A, one of the five conditions relating to antisocial behaviour must be met:
1. Conviction of a serious offence,
2. Breach of an Injunction to prevent nuisance or annoyance,
3. Breach of a criminal behaviour order,
4. A Closure order has been made on the property,
5. Conviction under a noise nuisance offence.
If the anti-social behaviour does not satisfy ground 7A, then landlords are left with discretionary grounds - Ground 12 breach of a term of the tenancy agreement and ground 14 causing a nuisance at the property.
The problem with these grounds is that they are discretionary, which means it is up to a Judge whether to award possession on the day of the hearing. Causing a ‘nuisance’ can be open to interpretation and what one deems as anti-social behaviour, another may not. Judges also need to weigh up the impact of making a tenant potentially homeless, so it is a balancing act against protecting the neighbourhood and community and housing stability for the individual.
The first possession hearing is only listed for 5-10 minutes so it is incredibly important for landlords and agents to ensure that their case is well presented. The Judge will look at the evidence available so agents and landlords must keep records of any reports, complaints or statements from the neighbours. Often those affected by the anti-social tenants will be reluctant to give evidence, particularly if there is a risk the claim may fail and they are forced to remain living in close proximity to those against whom they have given evidence to the court.
Section 21 Notices
Given the difficulties proving anti-social behaviour under the discretionary grounds, landlords typically utilise section 21 Notices as an alternative. Provided the requirements of Section 21 have been complied with, landlords can recover possession and are not required to demonstrate the anti-social behaviour grounds are satisfied. This, in theory, also protects any additional impact on the neighbours of the anti-social tenant.
Challenges and Considerations
While evictions for anti-social behaviour are a necessary tool for maintaining community safety and harmony, they are not without challenge and ethical considerations:
Balancing Rights: Eviction impacts the tenant’s right to housing, making it crucial to balance the rights of the tenant against the community’s need for a safe environment.
Financial Costs: The eviction process incurs significant legal fees, court costs, and potential loss of rental income. Additionally, landlords may face property damage linked to the anti-social behaviour.
Vulnerability: Many individuals involved in anti-social behaviour may have underlying issues such as mental health problems or substance abuse. Addressing these root causes is essential to prevent recurrence.
Support and Rehabilitation: Effective anti-social behaviour management should include support and rehabilitation for offenders, helping them integrate positively into the community.
Reform in the Private Rented Sector
The Renters Reform Bill was originally introduced to fulfil the Conservatives’ 2019 manifesto commitment to create a fairer rental market for both tenants and landlords. Amongst other commitments, it sought to provide greater security for tenants by abolishing the Section 21 ‘no fault’ evictions while strengthening the grounds on which landlords can seek to repossess their properties. The primary aim was to strike a balance between protection for tenants and giving landlords the confidence that the private rented sector is a good place to invest.
As part of the reforms, the Conservative Government planned to expand the discretionary eviction ground, to make anti-social behaviour easier to prove in court: clarifying that any behaviour ‘capable’ of causing ‘nuisance or annoyance’ can lead to eviction. Although in practice that would have made much of a difference is open to debate. The Bill did not make it through Parliament in time before Parliament was dissolved, and reform in the private rented sector is now up to the Labour party.
Labour's Commitment to Rental Reform
In the King's Speech briefing document, there are details of a new Renter’s Rights Bill. Amongst other commitments, Labour reiterated its commitment to abolishing Section 21 "no fault" evictions. Labour plans to introduce new, clear, and expanded grounds for possession, ensuring landlords have legitimate reasons to reclaim their properties. This approach is expected to be expedited, unlike the Conservative approach, which intended to delay abolition of section 21s until after court reforms.
Anti-social behaviour evictions are a complex and sensitive issue requiring a careful and balanced approach. While eviction can provide relief to affected communities, it must be handled with fairness, support, and a focus on addressing the underlying causes of anti-social behaviour.
Specialist Advice for Landlords from Woodstock Legal Services
Navigating the complexities of anti-social behaviour evictions can be challenging. At Woodstock Legal Services, we provide expert guidance to landlords, ensuring you have the necessary tools and knowledge to manage such issues effectively. Our award-winning
landlord and tenant team is here to support you with detailed advice and practical solutions. For specialist legal advice, contact
Anna Hughes
at
a.hughes@woodstocklegalservices.co.uk or complete the form below.
Contact Us
News & Insights
Having a clear plan to protect your intellectual property (I.P.) is one of the most important steps a new business can take. From your brand name to your website and logo, these assets define your identity and give you a competitive edge. In his latest insight, Media and Technology Law Consultant Solicitor Luke English shares the five most common intellectual property mistakes that start-ups make, and how to avoid them to secure your business’s future. 1. Failing to Think About Intellectual Property from the Start Your intellectual property is at the heart of your business. It’s everything you create that’s unique to you, your company name, logo, website, content, or trademark. Yet many start-ups fail to think about I.P. protection early enough. When you're launching a business, it is easy to focus on short-term goals like getting products to market or building your client base. However, failing to plan your I.P. strategy early on can have serious consequences. Competitors could register similar trademarks, copy your ideas, or even prevent you from using your own brand if they secure protection first. Early registration of trademarks, copyrights, and patents helps safeguard your innovation and ensures that what you’ve built remains yours. It is not just about protection; it’s about adding value to your business and strengthening your brand identity in the long term. 2. Failing to Carry Out Proper I.P. Searches Start-ups often come up with creative, memorable names and logos, but before you invest in design, marketing, and branding, it’s essential to check that your chosen name or concept isn’t already being used. A simple intellectual property clearance search can save you from major legal and financial issues later. Ensure that your company name, website domain, and social media handles are all available and consistent across platforms. This not only prevents disputes but also makes it easier for your customers to find and recognise you online. Failing to carry out these searches could result in a cease and desist letter arriving just as your brand begins to grow. Rebranding can be costly and disruptive, especially in the early stages of your start-up. Investing a little time and legal advice upfront ensures that your name and brand are genuinely yours to use. 3. Inadequate Documentation of I.P. Ownership In the excitement of building a new business, it’s easy to overlook paperwork, but documentation is vital when it comes to proving ownership of your intellectual property. Every idea, design, and creative output your business produces should be documented, dated, and clearly attributed to your company. Always use the copyright symbol (©) where appropriate and make sure that your trademarks are formally registered. This becomes particularly important when you begin licensing or assigning your intellectual property to others. Without proper documentation, it can be difficult to prove ownership or defend your rights if they’re challenged. Clear records also make your business more attractive to investors, who will want reassurance that the I.P. is securely owned and protected. 4. Failing to Secure Ownership of I.P. Created by Others Many start-ups rely on contractors, freelancers, or third-party developers to create important assets such as websites, apps, logos, or content. However, if the ownership of that work isn’t formally transferred to your business, you may not actually own it. Always ensure that your contracts with external providers include clear clauses assigning all I.P. rights to your company. This includes web designers, marketing agencies, and software developers. Without this, you could face licensing fees or even legal disputes later if you try to use, modify, or sell those assets. The same principle applies to employees. Your employment contracts should clearly state that any intellectual property created in the course of their work belongs to the employer. This helps to prevent ownership issues in the future and protects your right to use and develop your own creations. For example, imagine selling your company only to discover you don’t own the rights to your website or domain name, an all-too-common mistake that can seriously affect a business’s valuation. Proper legal contracts prevent this from happening. 5. Failing to Protect What’s Yours Even with ownership secured, your I.P. is vulnerable if it’s not properly protected in practice. Many start-ups make the mistake of discussing inventions, ideas, or branding publicly before securing legal protection. If you pitch your product or discuss your designs without a confidentiality or non-disclosure agreement (NDA) in place, you risk losing the ability to patent or register them later. Patent law requires novelty at the time of filing, meaning that public disclosure could make your invention ineligible for protection. Always document who you meet with, when and where meetings take place, and what information is shared. Having these records, alongside properly drafted NDAs, reduces the risk of leaks, plagiarism, or competitors “copying and pasting” your ideas. Protecting your I.P. isn’t just a legal formality; it’s an important part of safeguarding your innovation and ensuring that your hard work remains your own. How Woodstock Legal Services Can Help Your Start-Up At Woodstock Legal Services, we understand that launching a start-up can be overwhelming, especially when it comes to the legal side of protecting your intellectual property. Our team offers comprehensive, practical support to help you understand these challenges. Luke English , our Media and Technology Law Consultant Solicitor, can advise on contracts with website developers, trademark applications, terms and conditions, and confidentiality agreements: l.english@woodstocklegalservices.co.uk Richard Hiron , our Employment Law Solicitor, can assist with employment and consultant contracts to ensure I.P. created by your team is properly assigned to your company: r.hiron@woodstocklegalservices.co.uk By taking proactive steps now, you can avoid costly disputes later and build a business that’s both legally sound and ready to grow.
Buying or selling a home is one of the biggest financial commitments you’ll ever make, and knowing exactly what costs to expect can make the process far less stressful. In her latest insight, Kerry Parsons , Residential Property Conveyancing Team Lead & Consultant Chartered Legal Executive at Woodstock Legal Services, explains the essentials of Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) in 2025, and what every homeowner, first-time buyer, or investor needs to plan for. What Is Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT)? Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) is essentially a property tax applied when you purchase a home in England or Northern Ireland. It’s based on the purchase price of the property, with higher rates applying to more expensive homes. For most buyers in 2025, SDLT starts on properties worth over £125,000. That means if your new home costs more than this threshold, you’ll need to budget for SDLT in addition to your deposit, legal fees, and other moving expenses. If you’re a first-time buyer, the rules are more generous. You currently pay no SDLT up to £300,000 and then pay 5% on anything up to £500,000. It’s worth noting that SDLT doesn’t apply in Scotland or Wales, where separate systems, Land and Buildings Transaction Tax (LBTT) in Scotland and Land Transaction Tax (LTT) in Wales, operate. For buyers in England and Northern Ireland, however, SDLT is unavoidable in most transactions and can have a significant impact on your overall budget. Why SDLT Catches Buyers Out The importance of planning ahead One of the most common mistakes buyers make is treating SDLT as an afterthought. While it might not be the most exciting part of moving house, it can cause real financial headaches if you haven’t factored it into your budget early on. For example: Bu ying a freehold home for £300,000 as a first-time buyer = no SDLT. Buying a £300,000 home, having owned a property before = £5,000 in SDLT. That’s a significant extra cost, and one that can derail your finances if it isn’t planned for. Many buyers budget carefully for deposits and mortgage repayments, but overlook SDLT until late in the process. By then, it can feel like an unexpected bill rather than a cost you’ve prepared for. If you’re unsure, you can use the government’s free SDLT calculator to estimate your liability before making an offer Calculate Stamp Duty Land Tax SDLT and moving chains Another reason SDLT often catches people out is that many moves involve chains. This is selling one property while buying another. If your transaction is dependent on timing, or you’re buying before your sale completes, your SDLT liability could change, especially if you temporarily own two homes. Factoring in this possibility early is key to avoiding unnecessary stress later. Higher Rates for Additional Properties If you’re buying an additional property, such as a buy-to-let, a second home, or if you’re keeping your old property while purchasing a new one, you’ll usually have to pay 5% on top of SDLT rates if buying a new residential property means you’ll own more than one. This catches many people out. Even if you’re only keeping your old home for a short time, you’ll typically need to pay the surcharge upfront and then apply for a refund later, provided you sell within the current three-year window. For example, a property worth £350,000 would typically attract SDLT of about £7,500. But if it’s an additional residential property, the higher‐rate surcharge raises that to around £25,000, which is a major increase. T hat’s why getting professional advice early in the process is so valuable. Can You Claim SDLT Relief or Exemptions? There are limited situations where SDLT reliefs or exemptions may apply. For example: Transfers between spouses or civil partners Purchases involving multiple dwellings Certain mixed-use properties or shared ownership arrangements For most straightforward home purchases, however, SDLT will apply in some form. If you think your circumstances may qualify for relief, it’s always best to seek advice from a specialist tax adviser alongside your conveyancer. It’s also worth noting that SDLT rules can become complex in cases involving trusts, company purchases, or inheritance. In these situations, specialist legal and tax advice is essential to avoid mistakes or unexpected liabilities. SDLT Changes in the UK – Why You Shouldn’t Assume If it feels like Stamp Duty Land Tax is always in the headlines, that’s because it is. Successive governments frequently tweak SDLT rules and thresholds, sometimes permanently and sometimes temporarily. For example, during the pandemic, a stamp duty holiday provided buyers with short-term relief, only for thresholds to revert afterwards. More recently, SDLT has been a topic of political debate, with calls for reform from different parties. This is why it’s essential not to rely on what a friend or colleague paid in the past. The SDLT rules in 2025 may look very different to those in 2020 or even 2023. Always check the current SDLT rules with your conveyancer or a trusted tax adviser before making any financial commitments. My Conveyancing Advice – Plan Ahead and Budget Early From my experience as a conveyancer, the best advice I can give is to treat Stamp Duty Land Tax as a central part of your property budget from the very beginning. Knowing what you’ll owe early gives you room to plan your mortgage realistically and helps you avoid any last-minute surprises. It also ensures you don’t overstretch your finances when you should be enjoying the excitement of your move. It’s also important to remember that your conveyancer submits the SDLT return on your behalf, but it remains your personal tax return. The calculation could be incorrect if you don’t provide full and accurate information about your circumstances. Always be upfront with your conveyancer or tax adviser to ensure everything is properly declared. Another tip is to keep an eye on government announcements. Even small changes in thresholds or exemptions can make a significant difference to your liability. By staying informed and speaking with your conveyancer early, you’ll have a clear picture of what to expect. Final Thoughts on Stamp Duty Land Tax in 2025 Angela Rayner’s recent comments may have reignited the debate on SDLT, but the basics remain unchanged: SDLT applies to most property purchases in England and Northern Ireland Rules vary for first-time buyers, movers, and second-home purchases Planning ahead is critical to a smooth and stress-free move At Woodstock Legal Services, we don’t provide tax advice, but we do ensure our clients are fully informed throughout the conveyancing process, including SDLT obligations, and can signpost you to a tax specialist if you need additional guidance.
The Woodstock vision was to create a law firm that felt different, one where lawyers had true freedom and flexibility within a community of grade A lawyers and the best operational and regulatory support on offer - all while ensuring our clients remain our constant focus. Since 2014, Woodstock has grown into a community of more than 60 lawyers, built on the principle that legal practice can be both professional and personal. We set out to create a place where lawyers have the freedom to shape fulfilling careers, and where clients benefit from clear, expert advice delivered with genuine care. That vision remains at the heart of everything we do. By joining the Lawhive Group, we are strengthening this vision - combining the trusted relationships and values that define Woodstock, with innovative tools that ease the pressures of legal work. This means our lawyers can dedicate more time to what matters most: guiding and supporting our clients. As our founder, Carly Jermyn , explains: “I’ve always believed a different kind of legal culture was possible, and with Woodstock, we’ve proven it. We’ve created a place where lawyers are supported to grow their careers in a way that fits their lives and works for their clients. This partnership is about scaling that vision with the right kind of technology - AI that enhances our skills and values. What makes it unique is that our lawyers will have the opportunity to shape the tools they use every day.” We recognise that the use of AI in legal practice raises important questions, and that’s why this step is being taken in a carefully controlled and fully compliant way - with SRA approval, and while ensuring confidentiality and compliance remain at the centre of our work at all times. At the heart of Lawhive’s technology are AI colleagues capable of working alongside and supporting human lawyers. Lawrence, Lawhive's first AI colleague is a proprietary AI legal assistant. Lawrence drafts documents, completes case research, and handles routine case management with minimal input - scoring 81% on the rigorous Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE), far above the 55% pass threshold. The goal is not to replace lawyers, but to augment their work, reducing repetitive tasks and legal admin. "We're demonstrating that technology can support and enhance the best aspects of legal practice while creating communities where lawyers shape how that technology evolves," said Pierre Proner, CEO and co-founder of Lawhive. "We believe that Lawhive’s vertically integrated model of a regulated law firm and tech platform for lawyers to work alongside AI colleagues, creates better outcomes for everyone." For our clients, your experience with Woodstock does not change. You will continue to work with the same lawyers you know and trust, supported by the same ethos that has shaped our firm from the beginning. What evolves is the scope of what we can achieve, as we combine human expertise with pioneering technology to deliver legal services fit for the future. We are proud of what we have built, and confident in the path ahead. Read the full announcement on Sky News here.
Discover 7 common mistakes in UK employment contracts and how to avoid them. Expert advice from Woodstock Legal Services to protect your business
Fraudulent tenants can cause serious financial and legal problems. Landlord and Tenant Consultant Solicitor Zoe Turner of Woodstock Legal Services explains how rental scams work, warning signs to watch for, and how thorough tenant referencing can protect your property.
With the Renters’ Rights Bill (RRB) having entered its report stage in the House of Lords on Thursday, 4 July 2025, landlords across England are watching closely to see what shape the final legislation might take. In this insight, experienced landlord and tenant solicitor Ryan Heaven addresses a growing concern in the sector: will the same restrictions that currently apply to Section 21 notices also apply to Section 8 ? This article separates fact from fiction and offers landlords across the UK clear, practical guidance on what’s actually in the pipeline for Section 8 notices , and how to stay compliant. What’s Happening with the Renters’ Rights Bill? The Renters’ Rights Bill 2025 has remained a central focus for private landlords and letting professionals across the country. With the government proposing a wide-ranging reform of the private rental sector, one of the headline changes is the long-anticipated abolition of Section 21 notices , commonly referred to as “no-fault evictions.” Royal Assent for RRB is expected in September; therefore, we will know the final version of the law at this stage. But as with any major legislative reform, uncertainty can breed misinformation, and the slower the progress, the louder the rumours become. Section 8 Restrictions: What Are Landlords Hearing? One persistent rumour has been making the rounds among landlords and letting agents: The same restrictions currently applied to Section 21 notices , such as requirements for valid Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) , Gas Safety Certificates , and the How to Rent guide , will also be applied to Section 8 notices as part of the Renters’ Rights Bill. Let’s be clear: this rumour is false. What’s the Legal Difference Between Section 21 and Section 8 Notices? For those new to the distinction between the two possession routes: Section 21 notices allow landlords to regain possession of a property without giving a reason, which is why they’re referred to as “no-fault” evictions. Section 8 notices require the landlord to rely on one of the grounds for possession listed in the Housing Act 1988 . These include reasons such as rent arrears , anti-social behaviour , or other breaches of tenancy. At present, Section 21 notices are highly regulated. If landlords do not provide required documents, such as a valid EPC, Gas Safety Certificate, or How to Rent guide, the notice becomes invalid. Section 8 notices, on the other hand, are not currently bound by these documentation requirements. And according to government updates, that is not about to change. What’s the Official Government Position on Section 8 Notices? While the Bill continues to evolve, there are some concrete steps landlords can take today to stay ahead of the curve: Review your deposit processes to ensure you’re fully compliant with protection schemes and prescribed information delivery Understand the grounds for possession under Section 8 ; these will soon be your primary tool Monitor updates around the expected standardised notice form due later this year Seek early legal advice when considering eviction, especially where compliance issues may arise Being proactive now will save time, money and stress later. The earlier you resolve any grey areas, the stronger your legal position will be when the RRB becomes law. Specialist Advice from Woodstock Legal Services Whether you’re getting to grips with the Renters’ Rights Bill, managing a complex tenancy, or ensuring your notices are fully compliant, our award-winning Landlord & Tenant Team is here to help.
In his latest insight, Employment Law Consultant Richard Hiron explores how UK employers and HR professionals can handle personal relationships between staff in the workplace sensitively and lawfully. While there’s no specific legislation banning such relationships, failing to manage them appropriately could expose you
Following Ozzy Osbourne’s passing, Woodstock Legal Services explores the legal steps behind the scenes—royalties, estates, and what this means for others.
Having a working relationship with an outsourced HR provider can make day-to-day people management easier for many businesses. But what happens when that relationship goes a step too far? In his latest insight, Employment Law Consultant Richard Hiron explores when outsourced HR professionals may legally become agents of their clients, and why this matters. Why Outsourced HR Services Appeal to UK Businesses Outsourced HR services offer a range of benefits that have made them increasingly attractive to UK employers. These include: Cost-effectiveness compared to employing a full-time HR team Greater freedom in advising clients than being an in-house HR adviser A sense of legal separation, making HR advisers appear at arm’s length from internal decisions However, recent case law from the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) suggests that outsourced HR professionals may not always be as independent as they assume, and that they need to be very careful not just about the contractual terms of their arrangements with their clients, but also the practical application of the relationship. Handa v The Station Hotel: What Happened? The case of Handa v The Station Hotel (Newcastle) Limited and others [2025] EAT 62 raised important questions about the legal standing of outsourced HR professionals. We won’t linger on the details, because you didn’t come here for a lecture in employment law, but in essence: An employed director reported potential financial misconduct, which could have been classified as whistleblowing (also known as “protected disclosures”). Complaints from other staff members about bullying and harassment were then made against that director. One outsourced HR consultant was instructed to investigate those complaints and recommended that disciplinary action against the director be considered. A second outsourced HR professional conducted the disciplinary hearing and advised that the employer would be “justified” in dismissing the director for gross misconduct - advice issued in collaboration with the employer’s solicitors. Ultimately, the employer dismissed the director, based on the outsourced HR professional’s recommendation. What Is an Agency Relationship in Employment Law? It is not enough to simply provide a service or act helpfully to become someone’s agent in the eyes of the law. Legally, an agent is someone who has been authorised to act on behalf of another person or organisation, often with the ability to make decisions that directly affect that person’s legal or financial position. Typically, an agent is someone trusted to act in another’s best interests, which is why many agents are also fiduciaries. Trustees, company directors, financial advisers, business partners, and solicitors are common examples of these. What they have in common is the authority to affect relationships between the person or organisation they represent and third parties. Crucially, there must usually be more than just a contract for services for a person to be considered an agent. An agency relationship arises when a person has decision-making authority and is actively representing the interests of someone else with their approval. Without that, no matter how beneficial or reliable the service provided, an agency relationship is unlikely to be found. What Would Make an Outsourced HR Professional an Agent? In the Handa case, neither of the two outsourced HR professionals was found to be an agent in the decision to dismiss the employed director. But that doesn't mean an agency relationship couldn’t have existed elsewhere. Here’s where the legal line gets blurry: 1. Performing Core Employer Functions If an outsourced HR consultant performs functions that are typically reserved for the employer, such as conducting grievance processes or disciplinary hearings, they may be considered the employer’s agent. This is especially the case where employees or third parties deal directly with the HR provider, and the employer has little or no involvement. 2. Going Beyond Contractual Services Even where a written contract exists, carrying out roles that go beyond pure service delivery can give rise to an agency relationship. Whilst a fiduciary relationship is a key hallmark of agency, it is not the only factor in determining whether an outsourced HR professional will be considered an agent. This may include making final decisions on matters such as pay, dismissal, or internal procedures. 3. Exercising Authority Without Oversight Where the HR provider is granted authority to act independently, for example, to run a disciplinary process from start to finish without significant input from the employer, they may be legally classified as an agent. 4. Evidence of Collusion or Shared Control The closer the working relationship between the employer and the HR consultant, the more likely it is that the agency will be inferred. In the Handa case: The first HR professional merely recommended a disciplinary process. The second HR professional reviewed the evidence and concluded dismissal was justified, but did not carry it out herself. If either had gone a step further and directly made the dismissal or made other decisions on behalf of the employer, they would likely have crossed the line into agency. 5. Perception Alone Is Not Enough An employee’s perception that an HR professional is acting on behalf of the employer is not enough by itself to create a legal agency, but might be important if combined with other factors. However, in Handa, the director’s claims of being victimised after whistleblowing did not automatically make the HR professionals agents of the employer. How Outsourced HR Professionals Can Avoid Legal Risk So, what can HR consultants do to protect themselves? Be Clear in Your Contracts The contract with your client should clearly state the limits of your role. Avoid any language that implies you can make final decisions on behalf of the employer, especially regarding disciplinary action, grievance outcomes, or dismissals. Simply saying that you are not your client’s agent is unlikely to be enough, especially if your actions do not match what your contract with your client says. Stay Within Advisory Boundaries Advise, recommend, support, but don’t decide. Let your clients make the final call, even if you believe a certain outcome is justified. This is where the line between adviser and agent is often drawn. Avoid Acting Like an Employee Don’t allow staff to contact you directly for day-to-day HR matters unless this is carefully managed through a defined service agreement. Even then, remember that providing services like payroll, internal HR policies, grievances, or disciplinaries puts you in sensitive territory. Seek Legal Advice When in Doubt If you find yourself being asked to take actions that go beyond your usual service scope, pause and take legal advice. It may save you significant time, stress and potential liability later. Why This Case Matters for Employment Law Professionals The Handa decision serves as an important reminder that legal responsibility doesn't always rest neatly with the employer. If you’re working with HR consultants or are one yourself, understanding where legal boundaries lie is critical. This is especially important for: Solicitors working with SMEs who rely on outsourced HR providers HR professionals offering freelance or agency services Employers who want to reduce legal risk when outsourcing HR functions Specialist Advice from Woodstock Legal Services Worried about becoming responsible for your client’s employment decisions? At Woodstock Legal Services, we specialise in employment law advice tailored to HR professionals and consultants. Richard Hiron, our experienced Employment Law Consultant, has worked directly in the HR sector and regularly advises outsourced HR professionals across the UK. Whether you need advice on contracts, investigations, disciplinaries or complex whistleblowing concerns, Richard is here to support you.